This is definitely a great change. I won't have carpal tunnel now in the next few years.
| Gates of Arimyth https://forum.arimyth.com/ |
|
| Enhanced damage prefix https://forum.arimyth.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=4157 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | blue_myriddn [ Sat Jun 25, 2011 9:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Enhanced damage prefix |
[removed] |
|
| Author: | Zikur [ Sat Jun 25, 2011 9:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
anything that reduces the tedium of rolling should be beneficial |
|
| Author: | Gcanada [ Sat Jun 25, 2011 9:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
I really like the look of the purposed changes. I have been rolling an eth Giant Thresher, and it really is not an easy task atm (best so far is 30ias/ 477ed). I think it would add lots to the gameplay of the mod, and help to diversify the endgame builds that we see in hell characters |
|
| Author: | Steel [ Sat Jun 25, 2011 10:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
I believe I posted it already from pref/suff guide: Code: MaxLevel - An extremely powerful but badly underused field. This controls the point at which this affix will no longer appear on items. Say we have a Level of 10 and a MaxLevel of 15, then the affix will only appear on items with a iLvl of 10-15, whereas it will never appear on items with iLvls 1-9 and 16-99. This is the easiest way to get those crappy low-level affixes of higher level drops to ensure that those are useful. Just set max lvl to first crappy ones 80 so they will never spawn on 80+ wpns. |
|
| Author: | LockDown [ Sat Jun 25, 2011 11:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
I like it. I got really lucky on a 511 Zerker with one roll. But the ETH CB I've been rolling has been long and tedious. |
|
| Author: | Lee [ Sat Jun 25, 2011 12:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
This is definitely a great change. I won't have carpal tunnel now in the next few years.
|
|
| Author: | blinky99 [ Sat Jun 25, 2011 8:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
is 620 the highest ed or am i confused? if so how come no one ever rolls 620 ed items |
|
| Author: | LockDown [ Sat Jun 25, 2011 9:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
blinky99 wrote: is 620 the highest ed or am i confused? if so how come no one ever rolls 620 ed items Believe that's crafting not rares. |
|
| Author: | blue_myriddn [ Sat Jun 25, 2011 9:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
511% is a hardcoded limit. If you roll a 620%, it just rounds down to 511% Think of it like a refrigerator that can hold 12 beers. Your friends may bring over 20 beers, but you are only going to fit 12 of them in the fridge. |
|
| Author: | LockDown [ Sat Jun 25, 2011 9:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
blue_myriddn wrote: 511% is a hardcoded limit. If you roll a 620%, it just rounds down to 511% Think of it like a refrigerator that can hold 12 beers. Your friends may bring over 20 beers, but you are only going to fit 12 of them in the fridge. Whoa blue... we're gonna fit those 8 extra beers in the fridge someway 
|
|
| Author: | Steel [ Sun Jun 26, 2011 4:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
you can always set limit to 1000% ed in itemstatcost.txt. 620% wouldn't be a bad idea since CB is removed from actual use. Little more %ed vs zod runewords 550%ed. |
|
| Author: | Kannli [ Sun Jun 26, 2011 4:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
ye 620% would be cool |
|
| Author: | PureRage-DoD [ Sun Jun 26, 2011 11:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
 set that cell to 9 to increase the max the stat can have to 1023 Note: don't do it without a char wipe as all items with that stat will give bad inventory data |
|
| Author: | Baerk [ Sun Jun 26, 2011 12:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
I think you got the wrong item stat highlighted purerage. 9 bits would actually result in a range of 0 to 511%. It would require at least 10 bits in order to achieve a range of 0 to 1000+. |
|
| Author: | Steel [ Sun Jun 26, 2011 12:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
item_max(min)damage_percent should be the one. I believe dmg% spawns with both min/max at the same value. does it really return "bad inv data" ? I thought it would only if you lower below current. Sucks |
|
| Author: | PureRage-DoD [ Sun Jun 26, 2011 12:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
oops, yeh my bad maybe a beer to many with dinner. yeh steel changing the bits at all gives bad inv data on any item with the stat already. bit of a pain in the ass |
|
| Author: | blinky99 [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 6:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
i dont think ive seen/heard of a 620ed craft? |
|
| Author: | Zikur [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
blue_myriddn wrote: 511% is a hardcoded limit. If you roll a 620%, it just rounds down to 511%
Think of it like a refrigerator that can hold 12 beers. Your friends may bring over 20 beers, but you are only going to fit 12 of them in the fridge. |
|
| Author: | Steel [ Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
I've never heard of a refrigerator that holds only up to 12 beers. Must be a pain in the ass. |
|
| Author: | Baerk [ Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Enhanced damage prefix |
It's a very accurate analogy though. Each item mod has only a given number of save bits which iron cladly dictate an a non set item's capacity for a mod without getting into socketables (rules and limits change a bit when socketables get involved). At the moment enhanced damage has only 9 save bits for the mod size field and currently negative ED% isn't possible. As a result a rare that rolls with anything above 511% ED is forced to become 511% since the item mod's stat size field can only store from 0 to 511. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|