I get that the game was supposed to be challenging buuut...
Countess also threw around fireballs for ~900 damage. Thrack replaced Mortanus. So... wtf did I do wrong?
| Gates of Arimyth http://forum.arimyth.com/ |
|
| So, Baphomet replaced Leoric? http://forum.arimyth.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=8121 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Oxygen [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 4:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | So, Baphomet replaced Leoric? |
I get that the game was supposed to be challenging buuut... Countess also threw around fireballs for ~900 damage. Thrack replaced Mortanus. So... wtf did I do wrong? |
|
| Author: | Visuv [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 5:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So, Baphomet replaced Leoric? |
Check this http://forum.arimyth.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8016 |
|
| Author: | hunterAS [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 11:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So, Baphomet replaced Leoric? |
Death by misshapen  no bueno.
|
|
| Author: | Oxygen [ Sun Jul 13, 2014 8:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So, Baphomet replaced Leoric? |
hunterAS wrote: Death by misshapen no bueno.No, death by 900 damage lightning in an act 1 zone. Against a 1.3k health bear. |
|
| Author: | muleofal [ Sun Jul 13, 2014 10:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So, Baphomet replaced Leoric? |
Oxygen wrote: hunterAS wrote: Death by misshapen no bueno.No, death by 900 damage lightning in an act 1 zone. Against a 1.3k health bear. Get some more life and resists. My assassin had more life than that and doesn't have the luxury of the massive %HP that shift and oak sage give, and in no way was she taking 900 damage per hit either, probably more like 300. Gambling is the easy way around it, since champion packs drop huge gold piles. |
|
| Author: | hunterAS [ Sun Jul 13, 2014 10:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So, Baphomet replaced Leoric? |
you were probably a much higher level as well al |
|
| Author: | muleofal [ Sun Jul 13, 2014 11:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So, Baphomet replaced Leoric? |
hunterAS wrote: you were probably a much higher level as well al 20 maybe? Level 22 max. 1.3 life on a bear form is easy by level 15 or so. |
|
| Author: | Oxygen [ Mon Jul 14, 2014 8:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So, Baphomet replaced Leoric? |
muleofal wrote: hunterAS wrote: you were probably a much higher level as well al 20 maybe? Level 22 max. 1.3 life on a bear form is easy by level 15 or so. And tristram is a level ~14 zone. So maybe, just maybe something fucking stupid is occuring here. Something killing this game's normal progression curve, and killing the chances of any new players ever wanting to play, ever. |
|
| Author: | muleofal [ Mon Jul 14, 2014 9:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So, Baphomet replaced Leoric? |
Oxygen wrote: muleofal wrote: hunterAS wrote: you were probably a much higher level as well al 20 maybe? Level 22 max. 1.3 life on a bear form is easy by level 15 or so. And tristram is a level ~14 zone. So maybe, just maybe something fucking stupid is occuring here. Something killing this game's normal progression curve, and killing the chances of any new players ever wanting to play, ever. Considering that Baphomet/Leoric is/was never required for progression, it doesn't kill the curve. He's an optional boss. Leoric was no different and was definitely tougher than griswold/most of the other bosses in act1 in prior patches. I don't see the change there, it's just a different boss skin. Is there a reason you're so hostile to everyone who disagrees with your view? It sounds like you're just not up for the challenge, things didn't go your way and you just decided to bitch like a little baby. |
|
| Author: | hunterAS [ Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So, Baphomet replaced Leoric? |
I'm fully against the changes but yeah... Leoric could take on Andy without flinching lol... it's not meant for a lvl 15-25 character. |
|
| Author: | Oxygen [ Mon Jul 14, 2014 12:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So, Baphomet replaced Leoric? |
muleofal wrote: Considering that Baphomet/Leoric is/was never required for progression, it doesn't kill the curve. He's an optional boss. Leoric was no different and was definitely tougher than griswold/most of the other bosses in act1 in prior patches. I don't see the change there, it's just a different boss skin. Is there a reason you're so hostile to everyone who disagrees with your view? It sounds like you're just not up for the challenge, things didn't go your way and you just decided to bitch like a little baby. So, does that not defeat the purpose? Why even change those bosses if, as you've noted, they're not even necessary? This just looks clunky, quickly thrown together, unoriginal and unpolished. It killed the curve for me because I moved a few inches north of the portal and the boss was there, and it killed me. If that'd happened a few years ago when I first started playing, I'd have given him 2-3 attempts then thrown the mod away. This is shit. |
|
| Author: | Pwlloth [ Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So, Baphomet replaced Leoric? |
hunterAS wrote: I'm fully against the changes but yeah... Leoric could take on Andy without flinching lol... it's not meant for a lvl 15-25 character. come back at a higher level? |
|
| Author: | hunterAS [ Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So, Baphomet replaced Leoric? |
Pwlloth wrote: hunterAS wrote: I'm fully against the changes but yeah... Leoric could take on Andy without flinching lol... it's not meant for a lvl 15-25 character. come back at a higher level? Did you read my posts? That's what I'm saying... lol.... |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|