Zikur wrote:
People are correct when they say you cant vote on every single thing. nothing would get done.
When has this been done? When have community votes have determined patch changes? How can you say it doesnt work if its never been done. I see voting that has gone on in the forum and that is amazing. I am just saying I think that should be done more.
Zikur wrote:
That being said pious/kev have compiled a patch that is more than acceptable to the entire community because it is influenced by, but not controlled by, what the community wants.
I agree with you so why not let the community feel like they took an active part in the process and have us vote on the changes? First off if for some crazy reason it is fucked, then the community cant turn on anyone because they voted! So we avoid this whole process starting over.
Zikur wrote:
I see no reason why there cant be a small number of people in charge of implementing changes.
That is good but you are one person, again I am just saying I think the trend of voting on general patch changes aren't a bad one. If anything it gives feedback from the community that can help provide perspective for those making the changes. Its wierd to me how people are scared to vote on this topic lol. I think Kev and Pious are seasoned HU players and I have confidence in them. I am just saying allowing the community to vote and have a voice will only be a positive thing.
Zikur wrote:
The reason that person can't be blue are numerous.
I agree he isnt the right guy for the job.