Gates of Arimyth
http://forum.arimyth.com/

Erm, self owned with MH much?
http://forum.arimyth.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2762
Page 1 of 1

Author:  PureRage-DoD [ Sun Jan 16, 2011 3:27 am ]
Post subject:  Erm, self owned with MH much?

Prescot wrote:
We'v met an mh-er today at a5 ... spaming and fallowing us. he guided himself from ancient way to wsk2 without any problems ... not even asking for way than guided us to wsk 3 ... and wanted to guided wsk4 (since i dont remember how this lvl is called) i'm priving you cos i dont know where to repor it. i atttach screens of what did he/she writed.
Cheers


and here's the screenies
Clue: look beyond the message log)
Image
Image

LMFAO!

Author:  Just-ice [ Sun Jan 16, 2011 3:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

:D :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: epic fail :lol: :lol: :lol:

Author:  kramuti [ Sun Jan 16, 2011 5:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

I was DeeOhGee btw. I was very curious at lvl1 (even said somethin about it), but i haven't ever bothered to see if there is a pattern to it. Lvl 2 has one that is close to bullet proof (even with all the extra rooms on HU). But on Lvl3, when the zon said that I left, so did the other druids.

Prescot (the mighty barb) said to come back...we did once the zon left. Then zon came back and nobody would party.

We ended up failing at baal (got minions after some pain) due to a few that went afk (maybe asleep it was getting really late on this side of the pond) on an 8 person spawn, but cheers to those that walked from beginning of act 5 to there...and those that helped along the way.

G'night.

Edit: Notice that it was the same account as your post earlier Rage.

Author:  dew [ Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

same acct that i posted about yesterday *joint777
wish i wouldnt have passed out i was in this game still

Author:  IMS [ Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

Just made a new game with lvl 1 char, that andrada guy kept spamming caps lock and wanted to rush us to andy... No one seemed to want to make ng so we followed him because he was wiping all minions on his way without waiting us...

Author:  Steel [ Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

people are still strangers.

Author:  Zikur [ Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

Author:  stars [ Sun Jan 16, 2011 1:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

There is TON of mH going on. I was in a few games yesterday where it was blatantly obvious they were using MH. We really need to figure something out.

Author:  Zikur [ Sun Jan 16, 2011 1:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

nothing is good about mh but i personally dont give a shit and wouldnt go on a campaign to find them and ban them. if they are reported with proof sure, if they do these mega fails (which happen often on these boards it seems, who was the vet that slipped last season? haha) then ban them too. until we can get hu guard running we cant expect anything else to help the situation. even that is just a speed bumb apparently or so its been said. i do know it only needed to be run on one comp on any given network. mh is nto nearly as offensive as godmode and bots imho. unfortunately the method for catching all of these are pretty much the same, screens and self ownage.

Author:  Alexius [ Sun Jan 16, 2011 2:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

convert to 1.13 if possible for the next hu season, that way bnet fights hacks for you.

Author:  Steel [ Sun Jan 16, 2011 3:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

I dunno if pvpgn supports anything higher than 1.11, not mentioning about all plugins(tps, new locations) HU would lose

Author:  PureRage-DoD [ Sun Jan 16, 2011 3:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

the latest versio on pvpgn (the one that duff recently upgraded too) supports 1.13, the d2modplugins howere won't work on nything but 1.10 unless someone wants to hard code it all manually

Author:  Griswold [ Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

WoW - Seriously?

Author:  drrod [ Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

So has Duff got word of this yet? I'd say a blatant hacking violation should at least result in a locked account for the season.

Author:  DuFFBeeR [ Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

Done already.

Since I am not looking at every topic posted, is it possible to send me a PM when something like this happen ?

Thanks.

Author:  drrod [ Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

Great work Duff. I know plenty of MHer's are still around but even this is a nice message to send.

Author:  kramuti [ Tue Jan 18, 2011 1:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

Yep, good show. Most of those that have been around for awhile help to self-police the game, but it is very nice to see the ban hammer come to unapologetic abusers.

Author:  Wojihm [ Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

A couple of people who have annoyed me:

Zr (acc *zr), sorc, had cleared some of chaos sanc when i joined and spawned a boss. I noticed after 5 mins of fighting there that his hp went to full everytime he lost any amount of health. Was not using picked up 33% juvs, and was playing in a very hazardous way... which even costed him his life a time or two in those 5 min. Was godmoding.

Warm (acc *warm), lvl1, was joining a 7 player act2 game for duriel quest, spewing time buying nonsense. We unpartied him sometimes and told time to leave, I got a lag disc, and could not join again. Later I saw him in an act 3 game.

These are 2 I remember as the first one cheating and the second one annoying the other players for duriel quest only being able to, because we could not pk or kick him, and he perhaps had some mule in the party or someone invited him even though all us other 7 ppl didnt want to, while I was in the game.

In my opinion, ban the first. Delete the 2nd guys char. These two are detrimental to people who do not play in those ways.

Author:  Zikur [ Sat Jan 22, 2011 7:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

math fail

Author:  kwikster [ Thu Jan 27, 2011 8:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

ImageHere's another failure. Even though I may rant a bit about things i play legit. His acct is e520 fyi. Duff's been msgd already.

Author:  Norwazy [ Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

Was just about to post that one, Kwikster. lol. I was IceBurr.

Author:  drrod [ Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

Anyone know a good way to get proof of someone using chicken? Had a barb on my HC normal Meph run tonight that was using it, but a SS doesn't really show much except him dropping.

Author:  Lee [ Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Erm, self owned with MH much?

I'm sure if there is more than one witness and you're recording that is proof enough but other then that I don't know if there is anything else you can do. Chicken is very hard to prove but it is easily seen by someone and word of mouth doesn't quite work.. innocent until proven guilty.. recording would be the only real way and you probably are not going to randomly start recording so screw it.. the anti-hack was the best thing for cheating done here but as it doesn't exist anymore then there isn't much that can be done.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/