Quote:
I thought that everyone was in agreement that rabies was fine in normal. I only skipped them for that reason. If there was still a question on that, this is the first I heard of it:
i didn't say anything about the test. If your skills were as l33t as you claim you would have had no need for a high level to get you through norm, just as i didnt when i played mine. oak and melee equip is all that is needed.
Quote:
Your "experience" with the build though is wildly different from mine:
PureRage-DoD wrote:
I played mine from start to finish and it was not easy, they were basicaly an oak bitch early on and once packing a carrion they were good.
To be perfectly frank, that is just sad. I played the character through just fine and was more than an "oak bitch" for the game. Combining the carrion ring for the massive free damage would have made this character ridiculously easy to play. So you wonder why I question the validity of your "experience" with this build? That is like saying that you found a race against a bunch of people on biclyes "not easy" while you were driving a porsche.
oak bitch is short for summoner with an act 1 merc, crushing blow for bosses. You claim to know my playstyle yet you have never teamed with me? Thats pretty funny considering im usualy the one you will see tanking bosses with sin's/sorcs when the players like sasko/kasia/van_van playing the tank classes are running around like headless chickens yelling for juvs. I actualy played through most of normal alone as he started out as a summoner, I didn't need a high healer to carry me. as for the porsche comment, I don't really get what you are saying. He was on par with the decent builds that actualy work end game, some places he sucked, some places he was great he wasn't overpowered, If you had played one before you would know that. You expect people to listen to your view of balance yet you will never listen to anyone else's views on the builds from previously? You don't listen, you just wait for your turn to speak. Perhaps if you would ask for some players experience with builds (that they played unrushed from level 1 to 100 and hell baal/Los completed) against bosses etc. maybe you would have a deeper understanding of how the build was in hell previously. You take nothing on board and have no interest in other peoples experience though. You make underpowered builds that get carried through stuff then claim them to be fine and everyone else is so much worse than you then don't know how to play the build? I guess thats due to your "l33t" skills.
I already know exactly what impact 10k dps poison has on a2 nm stuff with lower resist aplied, as i was at 10k dps there only a few hours ago. It is trash and makes no impact on anything sygnificant. Don't try to tell me it is good in hell because I already know its trash in nm, from personal experiance. Also don't start the nec v druid argument. I'm using it as a pure dps example, im not comparing the builds. 10k psn dps is crap for a main attack
There is no point in arguing with you about this as you have a wierd view on balance. Balance means equality, rabies was on par with most builds before the changes, now its under par yet you claim balance, 10k dps on a hell har is not balance. talk to me about it once you have hit mid hell with a sub par build.
_________________
Bron wrote:
There's no cure for being a cunt.